Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:10
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What would have happened if Shin was a good movie instead of a bad one?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original - The Verge
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Are AI tools useful for recruiters?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the most inappropriate experience you have had with a friend's daughter?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What did Rama tell Sita about Kaliyug?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Reports: Bills RB James Cook ‘won’t be in Buffalo anytime soon’ - Buffalo Rumblings
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.